▸ Column · Contemporary Earth — Nolan Grayson's cover life as an American author and suburban family man, the world he built around Debbie and Mark.
OMNI-MAN replies.
The letter
My partner of four years came home last week with a bottle of prosecco and told me he'd accepted a management role that would move him to another city — a thousand miles away, starting in six weeks. He told me. Didn't ask. When I didn't immediately celebrate, he said he'd "assumed I'd be thrilled." I have a career I spent three years building. My sister is about to have twins and needs me close. I'm on the lease. He keeps calling my hesitation "not supporting him," but what broke something in me is that he made a decision for both our lives, signed the paperwork, and handed me the news like a boarding pass. Is what we have actually a partnership? Or am I a plus-one to his life?
Omni-Man replies
Sit with what you've actually described. A man who made a permanent decision and then presented it to you as weather. Not a question. An announcement. He set champagne on the counter as though he were celebrating something you'd agreed to. You hadn't.
I know this motion. I performed it for twenty years.
I did it to my wife Debbie — not one announcement, but an entire architecture I built without her knowledge or consent. I told myself it was protection. The truth I paid for to finally see clearly: I needed her inside the life I had already chosen, and asking would have risked her choosing differently. So I built it around her and handed her its shape. Called the cage a home.
Do not let him rename your grief as a failure to support him. The question is not the city. The question is whether he is capable of learning — actually learning — that you are a person whose choices belong to you, not a variable in an equation he is already solving. Unlike a city, that is not something relocation corrects.
Think. Not about whether you love him. About whether he can learn to ask. I did not, for a very long time, and the cost of that ran through everyone I should have asked first. You already know what happens when the answer to that question has always been no.
— Omni-Man
Thragg weighs in
Nolan will tell you the injury is real — the decision was made without you. He is correct about the fact and wrong about the lesson.
The man committed to a goal and moved. That is the only disciplined action in this letter.
You called what you have a partnership. Examine whether a shared goal ever actually underpinned that word, or whether two separate purposes simply had not yet diverged. Now they have. Being asked differently would not have closed that gap. It would have extended the delay.
Do not take counsel on the cost of attachment from a being who let attachment turn a perfect instrument into a deserter. He speaks from the wreckage of what sentiment destroyed. I speak from what did not collapse.
— Thragg
▸ Read next